Marian Hossa was fantastic again in game two against the Minnesota Wild. The Wild had no answers for his dominant play in both the defensive and offensive ends of the ice. Hossa and his Chicago Blackhawks teammates Chelsea Daggered the Minnesota Wild 4-1 to take a two games to none lead in their playoff series against Minnesota.
Hossa was involved in every play and the Wild as in game one had no answers for him.
After game one, I mentioned in my post game article that the Wild had to stop Hossa. Hossa embodies what the Blackhawks are all about. They opportunistic and they have speed. Their counterattack can destroy a team and that’s what happened today in Chicago.
Can Marian Hossa be Stopped?
Can Marian Hossa be stopped? I don’t think so. Hossa assisted on three of Chicago’s four goals. He assisted on the first, third and fourth goals. What makes Hossa dangerous is that even when he doesn’t score, he’s in the offensive zone causing havoc and winning battles for the puck.
In the defensive zone, Marian Hossa is also involved. He steals the puck and makes critical plays to bail out his team and then this opportunistic and has a knack of finding teammates streaking up the ice.
Minnesota Wild Need to Play a Complete Game
The Wild played two good periods of hockey but that first period was a joke. The Wild can’t afford to take a period off. They learned that the hard way as they fell behind to the Blackhawks 1-0 in the first period. The Wild managed only 2 shots on net in the first period. That’s pathetic and not good enough.
I blew a great chance of watching Sofia the First during the first during the first period. Instead I watched the game. Shame on me for watching that first period. The joke is on me. The only positive that came out of that is that my child had a good nap and is now well rested. As for me, I’m just frustrated and annoyed. All kidding aside, that first period was a real dud.
The Wild turned things around in the second and started to dominate the play but as usual they found themselves behind the eight ball heading into the second period down 2-0.
The Wild had their Chances but Only Scored One Goal
The Wild had their chances in both the second and third periods as they played an aggressive style of hockey but as usual, the team’s inability to score goals hurt them. Chicago doesn’t have that problem. They find a way to make their chances count.
I have no idea why the Wild didn’t play aggressively from the start. I think they would have had more success if they were more aggressive from the start of the game. If the Wild lose after playing an aggressive style of hockey, I can accept that. Playing a loose and relaxed style of hockey is something that will annoy me every time.
I’ve said all season long that the Wild make every goalie look like the great Patrick Roy. Sure they have played against goalies that had great games but their inability to score was evident in the regular season. The team averaged only 2.4 goals per game in the regular season.
The Wild need to play desperate hockey like they did in the first round of the playoffs. They will have a chance to do that in St. Paul as the series now shifts to the Xcel Energy Center.
Koivu Needs to Play Better
If he wasn’t trying to play pretty and fancy hockey by passing the puck instead of shooting, he was playing pathetic hockey in the defensive zone. On Jonathan Toews goal in the first period, Koivu allowed Toews to jump into the play and net the loose puck. After Hossa’s was on the breakaway and Ilya Bryzgalov made a great save on his shot, Toews rushed into the play. The rebound fell to the side of the net and Toews buried it into the back of the net.
Koivu had a step on the play but he stopped skating. Toews didn’t and that put the Wild down early. The Wild can’t play that way against Toews and company. They just can’t. This game was terribly disappointing for me.
I want to see more intensity out of Koivu. He is the captain and he needs to lead by example. He needs to play better and not make critical mistakes.
I’m not ready to write off the Wild just yet. They are coming back home but it’s looking more and more like the Wild will bow out in five or six games. Yes, that’s my prediction. The Wild will win a game or two but will not win the series. I guess I am writing them off, so if they turn this thing around, you will see the biggest homer of all will be ecstatic.
Jeff ,
Do you write for this site? I would rather read something from the heart as this piece was than a lifeless article without heart and this site allows those aspiring wrirers the chancw to hone their craft.
Thanks Tony. Trolls don’t care about that stuff.
By the way, this seems to be the same Jeff that criticized my writing on the article he calls articles. His sole purpose was to say I couldn’t write because I made a couple of typos. Jeff, you don’t have anything of value to add. You’re trolling this site.
After having read some of your other pieces from earlier, I’m assuming we’ll eventually see a piece about how the refs screwed the Wild out of games in this series, right? When you post something as horrific as that previous article, it’s hard to take anything else you write seriously. Articles like that lower the professional level of the rest of the site. I feel bad for the other writers here.
Games? I Only wrote about being screwed out of one game. This comment is unrelated to this article. Your sole purpose is to try and shame me but we should consider the source.
Wow! Harsh crowd. As a Wild and Bruins fan, one could make the argument that the Wild got screwed by a very questionable tripping call on Justine Fontaine.
Thanks Eric. Actually only one writer who is criticizing me . The guy criticized me on another article for poor writing for a couple of typos. His argument here is due to an article I previously wrote about game 5 in series one.
I’m not sure how his comment here is relevant.